JK Rowling Says Gender-Affirming Care is on Par With Nazism

The Harry Potter author is adamant the trans movement is a new form of dangerous groupthink

JK Rowling is in the news again. This time, Rowling is taking aim at the transgender movement. The famous author insists gender-affirming care is akin to the inhumane practices of the Nazi Germans.

Rowling received considerable pushback after making the controversial statement.

Rowling’s Legacy Will End Up on the Right Side of History

At the moment, Rowling is an unpopular figure with those in woke circles. The bodily autonomy crowd is passionate about empowering children to change genders when desired. Rowling has called out the practice, comparing it to the diabolical experiments conducted by Nazis nearly one century ago.

Though Rowling is being publicly persecuted for her controversial stance on gender-affirming care, there’s a chance her views will eventually be the norm. The sociocultural pendulum is beginning to swing back to the right. The ongoing shift in sentiment has more people not only considering Rowling’s views but also agreeing with the author.

Independent thinkers like Rowling insist we are living through a period of mass psychosis in which extremist views have become the norm. The problem is there is absolutely no justification for those fringe viewpoints.

Fast forward a couple decades or centuries into the future and you might find the species has returned to its time-tested traditions of religion and patriarchy.

“The Nazis burnt books on trans healthcare and research, why are you so desperate to uphold their ideology around gender? How did you type this out and press send without thinking ‘I should maybe check my source for this, because it might’ve been a fever dream’?” – Rowling

The Rowling tweet quoted above was viewed nearly 10 million times. Some of the viewers replied that Rowling is a Holocaust denier. There is some flimsy evidence that Magnus Hirschfeld, a German doctor of the Nazi era, advocated for trans people’s rights.

However, Rowling’s point still stands: today’s gender-affirming care echoes the evil experiments of the Nazi era. Trans surgeries are unnecessary and unjustified, especially when performed on minors whose brains have not fully developed.

Rowling and other conservatives are hinting that we’ve pushed science and technology too far. Our creator should be the only entity determining sex. The harsh truth is that bodily autonomy in the form of feminism and the trans movement are net negatives for society.

Consider the Psychology Behind Gender-Affirming Care

Rowling’s commentary on the trans issue amounts to a questioning of human psychology. It is quite odd that a growing number of people are changing genders in unison. The internet has reshaped human psychology, providing online encouragement to gender-confused individuals.

The time has come to question the psychology of those seeking trans surgeries and gender-affirming care. If our youth weren’t exposed to the internet and social media, they would not consider trans operations.

It appears that minor seeking trans surgeries have been brainwashed by online proponents of groupthink. It is that same groupthink that steered Germany toward fascist Nazism prior to World War II. Nazi groupthink had Germans riled up to the point that they willingly executed Jews en masse.

Is Humanity Compatible With the Internet?

The time has come to question whether the species is incompatible with the world wide web. The introduction of high-speed internet began with a mysterious DARPA program. The web is now ubiquitous on smartphones, computers, video game consoles, and more.

Though the internet has made life more efficient and interesting, it has also altered human psychology. Our youth are learning about gender transitions and gender-affirming care when they should be outside playing with their friends.

Short of a Stalin-esque government-imposed internet shutdown, we’ll like move forward with ongoing access to the web. However, there is a chance that our lawmakers will eventually vote to limit minors’ exposure to the internet.

As an example, delaying eligibility for a smartphone purchase until the brain has formed at the age of 25 would help. Rowling would likely be in favor of such a law as it would help minimize impressionable kids’ access to trans culture including controversial gender-affirming care.

The moral of the story is that kids, tweens, and teens are incompatible with the internet. Access to the internet prior to college graduation precludes the formation of important social relationships.

If we don’t take a cue from Rowling and act now, the trans movement will eventually go mainstream.